Geopolitical Focus – April, 2024

Geopolitical Focus – April, 2024: The WEF & Zelensky's version of Democracy

How did we reach this point where we witness a cohesion among Western Leaders galvanized during Covid, all united in the belief that we must save the world from extinction? The concept of the "great reset" still lingers, though those words are no longer spoken. In Germany, scrutiny has fallen upon the Covid management during the height of the pandemic, with many blacked-out pages obscuring the details. However, one thing can be assumed with a high degree of certainty: Science was not the driving force behind the decision-making, but rather a plethora of opinions and politics. Nevertheless, the main goal was achieved: to further intimidate anyone not in alignment with the government and media. If you analyze some stats from US states, the same can be said. Lockdowns or not, vaccine or not, the label was bigger than the impact. And if you question the political elite, ask JFK Junior. The left and the Democrats despise him as much as Trump, and the CIA as much as JFK.

You may wonder why we began with the WEF. There's a program within it called Young Global Leaders. Look into some of the names involved, and you might speculate whether for some, the indoctrination has permanently impacted their independent thinking. This raises questions about their role as elected officials: are they truly representing the people, or are they driven by ideology?

"For the past 19 years, we have embarked on a journey to identify, support and facilitate connections between young leaders who are committed to improving the state of the world. We provide learning opportunities, resources and platforms to help Young Global Leaders unlock their full potential, launch new initiatives and scale existing efforts. Amid these complex times, the YGL community has demonstrated resilience, unity and a vision for a sustainable and inclusive world." 

  — Nicole Schwab, Chair of the Forum of Young Global Leaders Board, World Economic Forum

If you examine the names prominent in politics over the last 5 years, you can certainly draw parallels to the obedience to the “Uebervater” Klaus Schwab and the reset. This may seem like a conspiracy to those who believe in the reset, a belief held predominantly by left-leaning media outlets globally. Simultaneously, the green agenda, climate initiatives, and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) are at the forefront of politics and moralist creed, while opposition tends to align with right-wing ideologies and anti-democratic sentiments, particularly in the Western (WEF) world.

Davos 2024: Recognize the names? - NEW YORK, Jan 9 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, French President Emmanuel Macron and key Middle East leaders are slated to attend next week's World Economic Forum, putting talks to end wars in Gaza and Ukraine at the top of the agenda for the global elite. -- And the wars have escalated daily ever since?

If we contrast this with the largest democracies in the West and compare it to the approval ratings of some of the Presidents, especially in cases where the legal system (as in the US) holds a stronger position than the vote, what is amiss here? Why are we electing politicians who seem to prioritize serving the Climate Czars and Health Gurus (like the WHO) more than the people themselves? In the cases of Germany and the US, where the AFD (notably strongest in the former GDR) stands as an Alternative for Germany party, advocating against the War in Ukraine and unrestricted immigration, the legal system is attempting to build a case to ban them from participating in elections. Does this sound very familiar? Here is the German document..

The most unpopular political leader is Olaf Scholz. This is shown by a negative ranking of Western heads of state and government by the New York Times. According to the survey, 73 percent of those surveyed were dissatisfied with the German Chancellor.

Emmanuel Macron (France) follows in second place with a rejection rate of 71 percent. Yoon Suk Yeol (South Korea) and Fumio Kishida (Japan) both come in with 70 percent, followed by Rishi Sunak (UK) with 66 percent, Justin Trudeau (Canada) with 59 percent and Joe Biden (USA) with 54 percent rejection. Alexander De Croo (Belgium) has the lowest rejection rate at 46 percent.

Note how the NYT used the “democrats” numbers for Biden's approval? Then journalists and governments call the Russian and Hungarian elections a sham, orchestrated by the inner circles of the parties in power, and cite voter intimidation, dismissing the 80% approval rating as a coerced opinion. Isn’t that similar to what the same media labeled the elections in Italy? Are they to be shamed as Fascist because they did not unquestionably support all EU policies?

The 2022 Italian general election was a snap election held in Italy on 25 September 2022. After the fall of the Draghi government, which led to a parliamentary impasse, President Sergio Mattarella dissolved Parliament on 21 July, and called for new elections.[1] Regional elections in Sicily were held on the same day. The results of the general election showed the centre-right coalition led by Giorgia Meloni's Brothers of Italy, a radical-right political party with neo-fascist roots,[2][3][4] winning an absolute majority of seats in the Italian Parliament.[5] Meloni was appointed Prime Minister of Italy on 22 October, becoming the first woman to hold the office.[6]

And now, by March 2024 she has the highest approval rating in the EU? But they still call her fascist?

And what happened to the elections in the Ukraine? Has anyone noticed in the West that Zelinsky singlehandedly (with the Bandera faction and inner circle) decided that there will be no election during War Time --  In order to avoid spliting the country?

So, we spend billions to defend democracy, but Zelinsky denies his people the vote to decide if they want to elect a potential Russian loyalist? Do you smell the rats? It’s the same as the no vote on where the people of Crimea want to be?

As seen n the agendas against Russia, the media, the White House, and the EU are putting up hours of coverage for anti-Putin reports, while Zelinsky demotes all people who are not part of his NATO trip.

(By the way, Stoltenberg now says NATO will support the war but no longer support Ukraine to be a Member?)

Meanwhile he jails journalists like Putin, who are not a part of the grand Western Strategy. Nevertheless, the search for WMD in Iraq was to lower the oil price; Is Democracy is still lacking?

Zelinsky is arguably the most delusional politician in the Western World, betting the house that he can beat Putin with Western aid. He's not the first to lose such a bet; perhaps a history study during his comic career would have helped? But if the US ends up with another Afghanistan result, we might just elect Stephen Colbert as President. He fits the loyalty crowd and the ideology, not much brain but at least a loyal democrat for life.

To top off the hypocrisy surrounding Zelinsky and the West's stance on democracy, it's acceptable for Ukraine to enlist NAZI sympathizers (Russians) to bolster their war efforts inside Russia with terror attacks, potentially guided by the CIA? This wouldn't be the first instance of such support; just look at the Maidan Coup and AZOV.

The Russian Volunteer Corps are an "official part" of the Ukrainian army, he said, "but we have serious political ambitions and political agenda". And that agenda is to "march to Moscow and dismantle the Putin regime", which is "obviously in the interests of Ukraine".

Here's an article from El Pais—note the picture featuring hard-core supporters of the war. It offers some interesting views. And here's a note from Al Jazeera about banning pro-Russian groups. Democracy seems to sound different; representing political global interests is perhaps a more accurate definition.

At least since Sherlock Holmes and the Hound of the Baskervilles, we know that what you don't hear is often more important than what you hear.

Like the meeting of NATO foreign ministers, who are preparing the birthday party for the 75th anniversary of the alliance.

Of course, the focus is on Ukraine and the desire of Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to provide permanent opulent support to Kiev.

But one thing that has been indispensable at NATO meetings so far is missing: the commitment to admit Ukraine to NATO.

This promise was secretly hidden in a bottom drawer. This is astonishing when you consider that the offer of membership was the trigger for the war in the first place.

But unlike in Europe, the United States has realized that sooner rather than later it will not be possible to avoid an agreement with Russia. This includes a non-aligned Ukraine.

As a consolation, the Ukrainians are allowed into the EU. Win-win for Washington. Let the Europeans have to deal with the expensive problem child.

Another sign of the times: elections in Slovakia won by a pro-Russian candidate advocating for peace.

Pellegrini's victory is considered a success for the government of Robert Fico, of which he was one of the candidates. Pellegrini is now expected to support or at least not hinder the plans of the government, which is made up of left-wing populists and right-wing nationalists. This development could mark a departure from the liberal, pro-European policies of outgoing President Zuzana Caputova and signals a possible shift in Slovak domestic and foreign policy – especially with regard to relations with Russia and support for Ukraine.

As Israel works to eliminate Hamas and carries out military operations across the region, there's surprisingly little coverage of the progress or the civilian casualties and destruction. While Israel may argue that Hamas operates from civilian areas, one must question whether the use of force truly achieves the intended goal. If the goal of eliminating Hamas does not extend to Iranian territories, achieving peace will remain distant. Perhaps the recent escalation, such as the bombing of the Iranian Embassy in Damascus, will spark further conflict, but it appears more like a desperate attempt to demonstrate success. Israel must engage in serious reflection if it wishes to ensure its existence for another decade and come to terms with coexisting with its neighbors, as it will not enjoy unanimous support from the West.

With AI systems identifying targets, warfare has entered a new era. One wonders if these systems make decisions with civilians in mind or solely focus on strategic military targets. Imagine a world where every bomb has 100% accuracy with GPS systems, following cell phone and other signals—a concept called target bombing. We receive warnings for hail, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, and sometimes mandatory evacuations, yet in wars, civilians are considered legitimate targets. Global military powers are observing these developments closely. Warfare used to be among armies, but as we create more laws and institutions to regulate warfare, conflicts become increasingly brutal, often disregarding these laws in the name of democracy.

The killing of foreign aid workers and the high number of civilian casualties in Gaza are increasingly causing criticism of Israel's conduct of the war. Even the United States, Israel's most important ally, is raising a warning finger. Israel emphasizes that the employees of an aid organization were selected as targets because of a false identification. But how does Israel choose its targets in the Gaza war in the first place?

According to research by the British Guardian, Israel is increasingly relying on systems that use artificial intelligence. The focus is on the AI platform "The Gospel". It is used by the Israeli military to quickly analyze large amounts of data and identify potential targets.

The former President of the EU Commission and current Polish Prime Minister, Donald Tusk, follows the European Russian haters in warning of a potential Putin invasion in Europe. It seems another COVID moment, aiming to remind people of the essential nature of paying NATO the 2% for supporting Ukraine and fueling anti-Russian sentiments. It's as if Russia started WWII and escalated NATO's presence in Eastern Europe. Let us be reminded of these words: 'G.M. Gilbert.'

Hermann Göring to G. M. Gilbert in Nuremberg: "[...] Of course, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That's clear. But in the end, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy and it is always easy to get the people to participate, whether it is a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist dictatorship [...]". Nothing new under the sun.

It is not all smooth sailing for inland wind power in France, as construction comes to an end, deemed unconstitutional due to the high burden on people and infrastructure. This marks a new development that requires further research.

Meanwhile, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled in favor of the so-called "Climate Seniors" in Switzerland, who sued the Swiss government for not doing enough against climate change. It's intriguing to see courts shaping our future based on scientific findings—perhaps they're following the example of ambulance-chasing lawyers in the US?

According to the ECtHR, climate change, which affects all of humanity, allows the admission of complaints from organizations active in the field of climate issues. Its goal must be to protect its members from the consequences of climate change and to act in the interests of them.

The Grand Chamber of the ECtHR explained the failure to respond to the complaint of the individual plaintiffs by the fact that individuals must specifically demonstrate their so-called victim status in relation to the inaction of a state.

The Court also held that Switzerland had not presented sufficient and convincing arguments as to why it had not wanted to take the action in response to the complaint lodged by the Climate Seniors Association.

The Court operates in the same spirit as the EU, with the latest accusations against their Leader, who allegedly ordered the COVID vaccines on her own terms? This leads one to believe RFK Jr has a point with his book "The Real Anthony Fauci"?

Top European prosecutors are investigating allegations of criminal wrongdoing in connection with vaccine negotiations between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer, according to a spokesperson from the Liège prosecutor's office.