Geopolitical Focus – June 2023

Geopolitical Focus – June 2023

Examining global developments, it seems that individuals specializing in Gender and Social studies are assuming positions within governments, supported by elected officials from the Green party, in order to establish an alliance aimed at informing the majority, known as the 99%-ers, that our understanding of history has been fundamentally flawed. They argue that this misconception has persisted since the initial arrival of settlers on American soil or the subsequent human population expansion after the split between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens. Is it possible that we should have allowed Mexico and Britain to retain control of the country and repatriated all settlers back to Europe? Considering Britain's historical involvement in the slave trade, it might be worthwhile for Gender and Social studies advocates to begin their analysis from that point in history.

It is not definitively known how or when Native Americans first settled the Americas and the present-day United States. The prevailing theory proposes that people from Eurasia followed game across Beringia, a land bridge that connected Siberia to present-day Alaska during the Ice Age, and then spread southward throughout the Americas. This migration may have begun as early as 30,000 years ago[2] and continued through to about 10,000 years ago, when the land bridge became submerged by the rising sea level caused by the melting glaciers.[3] These early inhabitants, called Paleo-Indians, soon diversified into hundreds of culturally distinct nations and tribes.

This pre-Columbian era incorporates all periods in the history of the Americas before the appearance of European influences on the American continents, spanning from the original settlement in the Upper Paleolithic period to European colonization during the early modern period. While the term technically refers to the era before Christopher Columbus' voyage in 1492, in practice the term usually includes the history of American indigenous cultures until they were conquered or significantly influenced by Europeans, even if this happened decades or centuries after Columbus's initial landing.

Here you can read the entire story. Further, you can take a look at The Men Who Built America: Frontiersmen, and check the term "Empire or Liberty" - In this series, individuals were covertly assigned the task of instigating a rebellion to seize California, ultimately leading to a war with Mexico. This acquisition of the 31st state proved lucrative due to the discovery of gold. It begs the question: does history repeat itself even this far back? Are we now willing to disregard past accomplishments as entirely negative and venture into empire-like states resembling the Romans, with authoritative governments and ideological boundaries? When will the world prioritize integration based on diversity rather than ideology? We are all equal but different, and tolerance appears to be diminishing rather than democracy, particularly among global moralists.

European countries are experiencing wake-up calls, and I have come across an interesting article highlighting these developments. Initially, when conservative thinkers—distinct from right-wing or fascist ideologies—were elected as country leaders, the EU responded dismissively. Instead of electing an EU leader, they simply appointed someone who aligned with left-wing and green interests, as well as displayed animosity towards Russia. Germany followed suit by demonizing the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, falsely linking them to the Nazis, despite the fact that they now hold a 19% support base and are limited in their parliamentary representation. This trend mirrors what we see in the US, where opposition is often labeled as MAGA or fascist, while those who label themselves as Democrats do the same. CNN's perspective on this issue is as follows...

While our reactions to the war in Ukraine may differ, we cannot help but admire how Zelensky skillfully garners global attention and how he is being manipulated by world leaders who seek to advance their own interests under the guise of Western values (which values precisely?). Here are some notable trips Zelensky has taken in recent years, and one cannot deny his ability to generate significant funds. However, with the latest speculative yet highly probable revelations that Ukraine may be responsible for the attacks on Nord Stream 2 and the dam implosion, one cannot help but question who truly benefits from these events. The former incident undoubtedly benefits the US as gas exports have skyrocketed, while the latter may be seen as a tactical move to initiate a significant counteroffensive.

Do Harry Truman's words still ring true this time, but with Ukrainians and Russians as allies instead of Germans?

Während des Zweiten Weltkriegs, am 24. Juni 1941, wurde ein US-Politiker in der New York Times zitiert: «Wenn Deutschland gewinnt, sollten wir Russland helfen. Wenn jedoch Russland siegt, sollten wir Deutschland helfen. Lass sie sich doch gegenseitig so weit wie möglich ausrotten.» Sein Name: Harry S. Truman. Er wurde im April 1945 nach dem Tod Franklin D. Roosevelts US-Präsident und befahl am 6. und 9. August den Abwurf der Atombomben auf Hiroshima und Nagasaki.

Bilderberg and other Global Elite thinkers – Why do democratically elected politicians engage in secretive meetings with these private organizations to discuss global issues? If we examine their agendas, we notice the inclusion of topics relevant to everyday people and democracies. Can you imagine a scenario where AI-generated and controlled media dominates the Western world, orchestrated through institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), and the influence of these elite thinkers? Would this result in mass manipulation?



Amidst this global turmoil, it is remarkable that Mr. Zelensky has managed to capture the attention of numerous world leaders. However, none of them seem interested in halting the madness, establishing a ceasefire, and addressing the genuine interests of the affected regions and their people. Instead, they passionately proclaim the defense of democracy while simultaneously pursuing agendas of hatred towards opposing forces. The EU labels Italian or Hungarian leaders as fascists, Germany targets the AfD, and the US associates everything with MAGA. Perhaps they should study the nature of fascism, as they appear to be closer to Putin than democracy itself. As for Mr. Zelensky, he may be an exceptionally talented comedian or even a skilled manipulator, but his achievements remain noteworthy.