US Politics - June, 2023

After lifting the debt ceiling and keeping all spending plans intact, what better opportunity than to delve into real politics? The woke movement, Trump's alleged indictment, and all the stories surrounding Hunter Biden and other questionable moves by Democrats deserve attention. However, as a nation, where are we truly headed? Do we want to be known for military aggression in the name of defending democracy? The concept of "peace through strength" only works if we establish clear boundaries and take forceful measures to deter potential threats. Alternatively, should we strive to become strong partners in win-win negotiations? It seems illogical that while China builds spy bases in Cuba, gaining Biden's approval, we feel threatened by Russia. Perhaps the Republicans in the House and Senate should direct their efforts towards uncovering the truth behind the Biden administration's policies rather than solely focusing on the January 6 incident.

Debt ceiling negotiations have raised concerns about potential criminal behavior and irresponsible spending. It appears that allocated funds meant to combat COVID-19 have been used for other purposes. Instead of rewarding such spending, we should be questioning why the allocation was flawed in the first place. One may wonder if, had the debt ceiling not been increased, we would have faced dire consequences similar to those during the pandemic when we did not adhere to government rules. Here is an article that sheds light on the matter, revealing the gravity of the situation. Additionally, a summary of the agreement can be found here.

The COVID-19 pandemic, although declared over, will have lasting effects, especially for the younger generation who will bear the burden of the financial aftermath. While pharmaceutical investors may enjoy substantial profits, we must carefully consider the cost-benefit analysis of the dollars spent on vaccines versus natural immunity, keeping in mind the inherent margin of errors and statistical limitations. Only time will tell if the money spent was truly wise.

With emotions running high ahead of the presidential primaries, the Republican Party has garnered significant support, positioning itself for second place. Various polls suggest that unless the Democrats can prevent Trump from running, there will ultimately be only one winner. Regardless of the efforts made by the never-Trumpers or the Lincoln Project to promote other candidates like DeSantis, it seems that these individuals are merely wasting resources, with the exception of Tim Scott, whose common sense approach resonates well. It's important to note that the policies we admire are inherently tied to the individuals who negotiated and implemented them.

On the other side, the Democrats are making every effort to avoid any competition for the presidency. It appears that the establishment and the political "swamp" are content with the current state of affairs, while the majority of the population, excluding college-educated Democrats (which is a staggering 80%), holds a greater dislike than favorability. In a world where politics has become a substitute for religion, with woke culture, reproductive rights, and gender issues at the forefront, it almost feels like a war. For these individuals, Joe Biden, with his lack of firm principles, becomes the preferred candidate by default. It is worth considering if there is anyone else capable of combatting the dominant narrative in the media circus, which currently revolves around Trump and his alleged misdeeds. Therefore, let us observe and see how the situation unfolds. If individuals like Robert Kennedy Jr. are considered threats to the establishment, it suggests that the swamp runs deep.

Amidst the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which offers no signs of progress, religious topics have once again risen to the top of Biden's agenda. The focus on topics such as transgender rights, pride, drag queens, gender fluency, and the education of children for the purpose of sexual orientation distortion raises concerns. While I am neither a psychologist nor a medical doctor, it seems logical to allow children to be themselves and prepare them for life. Unless one resides in a country where legal marriage at the age of 10 is permitted, the focus should be on providing children with education, sports, or any other curriculum that equips them for life. Drawing from personal experience with my own children, they are aware of their surroundings, and as long as educators do not unnecessarily interfere, they are capable of navigating life with the guidance of parents or other responsible adults. It is important to remember that Ms. Weingarten, you are a divider rather than a supporter of children. Please let go of your past and the lingering effects of your own childhood, as it only serves to hinder progress.

This brings us to the intriguing topic of transgender men in women's sports. One could argue that women are largely indifferent to the presence of transgender women in sports, as they do not represent a significant percentage of the female athletic community. Furthermore, team sports, whether at the collegiate level or otherwise, do not typically encounter such issues since transgender athletes are often directed towards individual sports that offer better publicity and a higher chance of winning. It would be interesting to hear the opinions of the US Soccer team if their opponents fielded half their team with transgender athletes. Megan Rapinoe, for instance, might consider this acceptable, as it would eliminate the suicide epidemic among athletes. Care to place a bet? It is absurd to assume that all transgender individuals solely rely on sports, while other non-physical activities could also provide them with fulfillment. Thus, this topic seems more like political fodder, driven by the loudest voices.

At the very least, these discussions divert attention from Biden and Hunter. If we were to approach their investigation with the same level of seriousness as the hypothetical lawsuits and crimes involving Trump, we could benefit from the press. However, for now, it may be best to turn off the TV, seek news from a variety of sources spanning the political spectrum, and form our own opinions.